Ohio sunshine laws give a pretty generous berth to those requesting records, but as with anything there are limits. This has come light in the small community in which I live where a local resident has determined to take his personal issues out on anyone and everyone, including the local (and even not-so-local) government officials. In his rampage he has managed to run afoul of all three no-nos I’m aware of in regards to Ohio public records law so it’s as good a time as any to list those for anyone who might want to know:
- You can only request a document once. Although not warned via email, the resident would make a request for some specific documents, and then later request a range in which the previous documents were included. Not as bad as the other offences, but it fits a pattern of behavior.
- You cannot request a document that doesn’t exist. This seems obvious, but the requester in this case made repeated requests for a ‘draft’ document that did not exist, and, not satisfied with not getting that document that did not exist, he then demanded that I create documents on various informal procedures that I follow. The requestor was warned repeatedly about harassing me for documents that don’t exist, which of course resulted in just more harassment.
- No fishing expeditions. This was actually the last straw in that the requestor made a request for a wide range of records (six years of complete payment records) and when that was denied he started cutting up the request so that he could get all six years in six different requests to circumvent the rule.
He also later stepped in a fourth no-no when Ohio said that Fiscal Officers (and others I believe) no longer had to stack up all their post-it notes for possible records requests. He, of course, continues to this day to request such “records” despite my repeatedly telling him that he is not entitled to them (with one trustee wondering what the point of his request was anyway since my handwriting is, alas, pretty illegible).
His attempts to game and abuse the system is part of what led to our record requests being filtered by our lawyer. To what end he’s leveling this abuse I do not know since from all his conversations he’s only read the contents of maybe one request, one that he has repeatedly lied about the contents of. I would think that if he was just going to make up the substance of a document why did he bother requesting it to begin with? He could just say that he got whatever documents he imagines, real or not, and then he’s free to make believe they say whatever he wants. It would be freeing in a way, for everyone. Who knows, he could even imagine that in one of our documents his dad still loves him (or whatever his hang-up is), giving him some modicum of peace.
Anyway, I’ve spilled too much ink on this guy already, my brain feels dirty even thinking about him so here’s a picture of our sheep from back in the winter:


